VAN DE PUT & CO Banquiers Privés products, services and reviews

About VAN DE PUT & CO Banquiers Privés

VAN DE PUT & CO Banquiers Privés operates as a private banking and wealth management firm focused on investment services for high-net-worth individuals and families, with an offering centered on discretionary and advisory portfolio management, order execution, and custody through third-party custodians rather than mass‑market retail banking. Publicly available information suggests a lean product set built around direct securities, investment funds, fixed income, and, where suitable, structured instruments, with relationship managers driving advice and ongoing monitoring; everyday banking features such as current accounts, cards, and broad lending are limited or absent. The firm’s model typically involves a management fee complemented by transaction and custody charges, and may include performance fees depending on the mandate; prospective clients should request a full breakdown of all costs, including any inducements or retrocessions, before onboarding. As with other investment firms, client onboarding normally includes MiFID‑compliant suitability assessments, a written mandate, and periodic reporting; digital access is generally available but not positioned as a full online bank. Governance, financial statements, conflicts‑of‑interest handling, best‑execution practices, and order‑routing policies are not extensively detailed in the public domain, so obtaining up‑to‑date regulatory disclosures and client documentation is essential to assess transparency and operational robustness. For asset safety, verify where securities and cash are held, how segregation is implemented at the custodian, and what protection schemes apply, as coverage and limits differ for deposits and investments; also confirm the firm’s current authorization and supervisory status in the Belgian registers and request its complaints policy and data‑protection notice. Compared with universal banks, the proposition is narrower but more focused on portfolio oversight; trade‑offs include potential dependence on key personnel and a smaller product shelf, while potential advantages include open‑architecture access and reduced in‑house product conflicts, subject to the specifics of the fee and inducement framework disclosed by the firm.